4.7 Article

Apoptotic effect of eugenol envolves G2/M phase abrogation accompanied by mitochondrial damage and clastogenic effect on cancer cell in vitro

期刊

PHYTOMEDICINE
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 725-735

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2016.03.014

关键词

Eugenol; Cancer; Mitochondria potential; Cell-cycle; Apoptosis

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Eugenol (EUG) is a major phenolic compound present in clove whose anti-cancer properties have been demonstrated previously. These anti-cancer properties may involves the modulation of different mechanisms, including alpha-estrogen receptor (alpha ER) in luminal breast cancer cells, COX-2 inhibition in melanoma cells or p53 and caspase-3 activation in colon cancer cells. Hypothesis: EUG promotes a burst in ROS production causing cell-cycle perturbations, mitochondria toxicity and clastogenesis triggering apoptosis in melanoma breast-and cervix-cancer cells in vitro. Methods: Morphological changes were evaluated through the light-and electronic-microscopy. Cell-cycle, ROS, PCNA and Apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry and clastogenicity was evaluated by Comet-assay. Results: The results obtained herein pointed out that EUG promotes, increasing ROS production leading to abrogation of G2/M of phase of cell-cycle, and consecutively, clastogenesis in vitro. In addition, EUG induces Proliferation Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) downregulation and decreasing in mitochondria potential (Delta Psi m). Of note, a Bax up-regulation was also observed on cells treated with EUG. All of these findings cooperate in order to induce apoptosis in cancer cells. Conclusion: These promising results presented herein shed new light on the mechanisms of action of EUG suggesting a possible applicability of this phenylpropanoid as adjuvant in anti-cancer therapy. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据