4.8 Article

7Be(n,α)4He Reaction and the Cosmological Lithium Problem: Measurement of the Cross Section in a Wide Energy Range at n_TOF at CERN

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 117, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.152701

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Atomic Energy Communitys (Euratom) Seventh Framework Programme FP7 under the Project CHANDA [605203]
  2. Narodowe Centrum Nauki (NCN) [UMO-2012/04/M/ST2/00700]
  3. EPSRC [EP/N00700X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. STFC [ST/N00244X/1, ST/L005794/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N00700X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/N00244X/1, ST/L005794/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The energy-dependent cross section of the (7)Bed(n,alpha)He-4 reaction, of interest for the so-called cosmological lithium problem in big bang nucleosynthesis, has been measured for the first time from 10 meV to 10 keV neutron energy. The challenges posed by the short half-life of Be-7 and by the low reaction cross section have been overcome at n_TOF thanks to an unprecedented combination of the extremely high luminosity and good resolution of the neutron beam in the new experimental area (EAR2) of the n_TOF facility at CERN, the availability of a sufficient amount of chemically pure Be-7, and a specifically designed experimental setup. Coincidences between the two alpha particles have been recorded in two Si-Be-7-Si arrays placed directly in the neutron beam. The present results are consistent, at thermal neutron energy, with the only previous measurement performed in the 1960s at a nuclear reactor. The energy dependence reported here clearly indicates the inadequacy of the cross section estimates currently used in BBN calculations. Although new measurements at higher neutron energy may still be needed, the n_TOF results hint at a minor role of this reaction in BBN, leaving the long-standing cosmological lithium problem unsolved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据