4.7 Review

Detection of nitrifiers and evaluation of partial nitrification for wastewater treatment: A review

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 85-98

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.004

关键词

Partial nitrification; Ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB); Nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB); Anammox; Wastewater; Nitritation

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21177005]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China [2012AA063406]
  3. Shanghai Tongji Gao Tingyao Environmental Science and Technology Development Foundation (STGEF)
  4. Scholarship of Shanghai Tongji Gao Tingyao Environmental Science and Technology Development Foundation (STGEF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Partial nitrification has gained broad interests in the biological nitrogen removal (BNR) from wastewater, since it alleviates carbon limitation issues and acts as a shortcut nitrogen removal system combined with anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Anammox) process. The occurrence and maintenance of partial nitrification relies on various conditions, which favor ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) but inhibit or limit nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB). The studies of the AOB and NOB activities have been conducted by state-of-the-art molecular techniques, such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), Quantitative PCR, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique, Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP), Live/Dead BacLight, and quinone profile. Furthermore, control strategies for obtaining partial nitrification are mainly focused on the pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen concentration, real-time aeration control, sludge retention time, substrate concentration, alternating anoxic and aerobic operation, inhibitor and ultrasonic treatment. Existing problems and further perspectives for the scale-up of partial nitrification are also proposed and suggested. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据