4.7 Article

Suppression of dioxins in waste incinerator emissions by recirculating SO2

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 75-81

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.080

关键词

Hazardous waste incineration; PCDD/Fs; SO2 circulation; Inhibition; Suppression; Thermal treatment of filtered ash

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Key Program of China (863 Program) [2012AA062803]
  2. National Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB201503]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [51406182]
  4. Introducing Talents of Discipline to University [B08026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulphur is an effective inhibitor of the formation of Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzo-furans (PCDD/Fs), as was proven in laboratory and pilot plant studies. In this study, a pilot-scale system with capacity 300 N m(3) h(-1) was situated at the bypass of an actual hazardous waste incinerator (HWI) and tested to reduce the emission of PCDD/Fs. Activated carbon was used as a medium to adsorb SO2 from flue gas and release it again at the higher temperature of filtered ash detoxification to achieve SO2 circulation in the system. Most PCDD/Fs in the filtered ash are decomposed by thermal treatment. Experimental results indicate that the system is capable of stable operation with SO2 accumulation at a high level of concentration and a high reduction efficiency of PCDD/Fs. A reduction of more than 80% was already achieved without addition of other sulphur compounds. When pyrite (FeS2) was added the reduction of PCDD/Fs could reach 94%, with a residual PCDD/Fs concentration in the flue gas as low as 0.13 ng TEQN m(-3). This SO2 recirculating and suppression technology potentially provides significant progress for dioxin emission control in waste incineration and could be useful for controlling emissions of PCDD/Fs and other chlorinated organic chemicals in China. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据