4.7 Article

Improvement of NIR model by fractional order Savitzky-Golay derivation (FOSGD) coupled with wavelength selection

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.02.017

关键词

FOSGD; SCARS; NIR modeling; Spectral resolution; Signal strength

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [222201314039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spectral pretreatment is of great importance in near infrared (NIR) spectral analysis since NIR spectra of samples almost always contain overlapped bands due to different chemical compositions of the samples, which may strongly affect the performance of the analysis system. Derivation is a good and commonly used spectral pretreatment method, which may enhance spectral resolution with increase of derivative order, but reduce strength of the spectral signals meanwhile. In this study, the derivative method of fractional order Savitzky-Golay derivation (FOSGD) and the wavelength selection method of stability competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (SCARS) were coupled to optimize the NIR spectramodel. FOSGD could use a decimal number between two adjacent integral numbers as the derivative order to supply a better chance to balance the contradiction of resolution and signal strength than integer order Savitzky-Golay derivation (IOSGD). And wavelength selection could efficiently extract the informative variables with improved resolution and eliminate the influence of the uninformative variables. Three kinds of NIR datasets including simulated datasets, diesel dataset and tobacco dataset were utilized to assess this method. The results showed that FOSGD-SCARS had better performance on optimizing PLS models with smaller RMSECV and RMSEP values than FOSGD or SCARS. Comparing with IOSGD, FOSGD often shows greater advantages, especially for the interest components with narrower bandwidth. This method is convenient and has strong application potential in spectral analysis. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据