4.3 Article

The specificity of host-bat fly interaction networks across vegetation and seasonal variation

期刊

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 115, 期 10, 页码 4037-4044

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-016-5176-1

关键词

Chiroptera; Mexico; Mormoopidae; Noctilionidae; Phyllostomidae; Streblidae

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) as part of the Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias Biologicas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  2. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico through the operational budget allocated to the Laboratorio de Ecologia y Conservacion de Mamiferos Tropicales at IIES-UNAM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vegetation type and seasonality promote changes in the species composition and abundance of parasite hosts. However, it is poorly known how these variables affect host-parasite interaction networks. This information is important to understand the dynamics of parasite-host relationships according to biotic and abiotic changes. We compared the specialization of host-bat fly interaction networks, as well as bat fly and host species composition between upland dry forest and riparian forest and between dry and rainy seasons in a tropical dry forest in Jalisco, Mexico. Bat flies were surveyed by direct collection from bats. Our results showed that hostbat fly interaction networks were more specialized in upland dry forest compared to riparian forest. Bat fly species composition was different between the dry and rainy seasons, while host species composition was different between upland dry forest and riparian forest. The higher specialization in upland dry forest could be related to the differences in bat host species composition and their respective roosting habits. Variation in the composition of bat fly species between dry and rainy seasons coincides with the seasonal shifts in their species richness. Our study confirms the high specialization of host-bat fly interactions and shows the importance of biotic and abiotic factors to understand the dynamics of parasite-host interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据