4.6 Article

Cooperative Binding of Divalent Diamides by N-Alkyl Ammonium Resorcinarene Chlorides

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 26, 页码 9556-9562

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201406504

关键词

amides; cooperative phenomena; host-guest systems; hydrogen bonding; molecular recognition; self-assembly

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [263256, 265328, 258653]
  2. University of Jyvaskyla, Finland
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-1212971]
  4. Division Of Chemistry
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1212971] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-Alkyl ammonium resorcinarene chlorides, stabilized by an intricate array of hydrogen bonds leading to a cavitand-like structure, bind amides. The molecular recognition occurs through intermolecular hydrogen bonds between the carbonyl oxygen and the amide hydrogen of the guests and the cation-anion circular hydrogen-bonded seam of the hosts, as well as through CH interactions. The N-alkyl ammonium resorcinarene chlorides cooperatively bind a series of di-acetamides of varying spacer lengths ranging from three to seven carbons. Titration data fit either a 1:1 or 2:1 binding isotherm depending on the spacer lengths. Considering all the guests possess similar binding motifs, the first binding constants were similar (K-1:10(2)M(-1)) for each host. The second binding constant was found to depend on the upper rim substituent of the host and the spacer length of the guests, with the optimum binding observed with the six-carbon spacer (K-2:10(3)M(-2)). Short spacer lengths increase steric hindrance, whereas longer spacer lengths increase flexibility thus reducing cooperativity. The host with the rigid cyclohexyl upper rim showed stronger binding than the host with flexible benzyl arms. The cooperative binding of these divalent guests was studied in solution through (HNMR)-H-1 titration studies and supplemented by diffusion-ordered spectroscopy (DOSY), X-ray crystallography, and mass spectrometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据