4.3 Article

In vitro culture of Mesocestoides corti metacestodes and isolation of immunomodulatory excretory-secretory products

期刊

PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 38, 期 7, 页码 403-413

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pim.12327

关键词

culture; excretions-secretions; immunomodulation; metacestode

资金

  1. DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service)
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim
  3. Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of Slovak Republic
  4. Academy of Sciences, VEGA [2/0150/13]
  5. Centre of Excellence for Parasitology SAS [ITMS 26220120022]
  6. European Regional Development Fund, Slovakia
  7. Claude Leon Foundation
  8. Academy of Science of South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cestode-mediated diseases hold the interesting feature of persisting metacestode larvae dwelling within the host tissues, in the midst of the immune response. Excretory-secretory (ES) products of the metacestode larval stage modulate the host immune response and modify the outcome of the disease. Therefore, isolation and analysis of axenic metacestode ES products are crucial to study their properties. Here, we report the development of a system for long-term in vitro cultivation of the metacestode of the parasitic cestode Mesocestoides corti (syn. Mesocestoides vogae). Although feeder cells and host serum supported the early growth of the parasite, long-term survival was not dependent on host serum or host-derived factors enabling the collection of parasite released products in serum-free medium. Functionally, these axenic ES products recapitulated M. corti tetrathyridia's ability to inhibit LPS-driven IL-12p70 secretion by dendritic cells. Thus, our new axenic culture system will simplify the identification and characterization of M. corti-derived immunomodulatory factors that will indirectly enable the identification and characterization of corresponding factors in the metacestode larvae of medically relevant cestodes such as Echinococcus multilocularis that are not yet amenable to serum-free cultivation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据