4.3 Article

Proposed power transmission lines in Cambodia constitute a significant new threat to the largest population of the Critically Endangered Bengal florican Houbaropsis bengalensis

期刊

ORYX
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 147-155

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0030605316000739

关键词

Bengal florican; bustard; Cambodia; collision mortality; Houbaropsis bengalensis; power line; Tonle Sap

资金

  1. Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund
  2. Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund
  3. Chester Zoo/North of England Zoological Society
  4. North Star Science Technology
  5. Ford Motor Company
  6. National Avian Research Centre-International Fund for Houbara Conservation
  7. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  8. [SFRH/BPD/72311/2010]
  9. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/72311/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The remaining Indochina population of the Critically Endangered Bengal florican Houbaropsis bengalensis breeds in the floodplain of Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake. The population has declined substantially but survival rates have not been published previously. Survival could potentially be reduced by the planned construction of high-tension power transmission lines that may begin in 2016. Using data from 17 individuals monitored by satellite transmitters over. years we estimated the annual adult survival rate to be 89.9% (95% CI 82.2-97.6%), which is comparable to that of other bustards. Interrogation of movement paths revealed that for the.. individuals for which we had sufficient data for non-breeding seasons, all annual migration routes between breeding and non-breeding areas crossed the proposed route of the transmission line. The route also impinged on the margins of one important and one minor breeding concentration. A review of bustard collision rates confirmed the vulnerability of bustards to power lines, and the proposed development therefore presents an additional threat to the future of this species in Indochina.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据