4.5 Article

Vibration analysis of historic bell towers by means of contact and remote sensing measurements

期刊

NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING AND EVALUATION
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 331-359

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2015.1121264

关键词

Ambient vibration tests; natural frequencies; modal parameters; microwave interferometry; non-destructive testings; cultural heritage structures

资金

  1. Sardinia Regional Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamic behaviour of two slender structures with very similar geometry has been investigated in order to evaluate the role played by the construction materials; the comparison has thus been conducted on their vibration properties as resonance frequencies, damping coefficients and mode shapes. The studied structures are two bell towers of a church which were built in two different historical times, with an interval of about one century, using different construction techniques and materials. The experimental tests were carried out by means of output-only measurements of ambient vibration using both contact and non-contact techniques. The signals have been acquired using a tri-directional tromometer or two short period seismometers, both placed in prearranged station points on the structures. Furthermore, the vibrations of the structures have also been measured with the IBIS-S microwave interferometer which is able to provide submillimetric displacements along the radar Line Of Sight without need of any contact with the surface. Therefore, the experimental dynamic response of the church-towers system has been estimated integrating both velocity and displacement data. Though the vibration of the structures had low magnitude, both surveys allowed us to identify the main linear dynamic properties of the structures. Based on these passive surveys, a linear finite element model was calibrated in order to confirm the relationship between the materials and vibration properties. The final model has been locally validated by means of in situ acoustic measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据