4.4 Article

Microstructural models for diffusion MRI in breast cancer and surrounding stroma: an ex vivo study

期刊

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3679

关键词

anisotropy; breast cancer; diffusion; DTI; ex vivo; MRI; restriction

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant 'MIMIC' [EP/K020439/1]
  2. EU FP7 Virtual Physiological Human grant 'VPH-PRISM' [FP7-ICT-2011-9, 601040]
  3. Cancer Research UK [16463] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N021967/1, EP/M020533/1, EP/G007748/1, EP/K020439/1, EP/H046410/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0509-10143] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/H046410/1, EP/G007748/1, EP/K020439/1, EP/N021967/1, EP/M020533/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diffusion signal in breast tissue has primarily been modelled using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion tensor (DT) models, which may be too simplistic to describe the underlying tissue microstructure. Formalin-fixed breast cancer samples were scanned using a wide range of gradient strengths, durations, separations and orientations. A variety of one-and two-compartment models were tested to determine which best described the data. Models with restricted diffusion components and anisotropy were selected in most cancerous regions and there were no regions in which conventional ADC or DT models were selected. Maps of ADC generally related to cellularity on histology, but maps of parameters from more complex models suggest that both overall cell volume fraction and individual cell size can contribute to the diffusion signal, affecting the specificity of ADC to the tissue microstructure. The areas of coherence in diffusion anisotropy images were small, approximately 1 mm, but the orientation corresponded to stromal orientation patterns on histology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据