4.6 Article

RSL class I genes positively regulate root hair development in Oryza sativa

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 213, 期 1, 页码 314-323

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14160

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors; Oryza sativa; rice; root hair; ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE-SIX LIKE (RSL) class I genes; roots

资金

  1. Oxford Martin School
  2. European Research Council [EVO500, 25028]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Research Council [BBG0198941]
  4. Next-Generation BioGreen21 Program, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ011146, PJ011039]
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G019894/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/G019894/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Root hairs are filamentous protuberances from superficial cells of plant roots that are critical for nutrient uptake. Genes encoding ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE-SIX LIKE (RSL) class I basic helix-loop-helix proteins are expressed in future root hair cells (trichoblasts) of the Arabidopsis thaliana root where they positively regulate root hair cell development. We characterized the function of class I genes in Oryza sativa root development. We show that there are three RSL class I genes in O. sativa and that each is expressed in developing root hair cells. Reduction of RSL class I function results in the development of shorter root hairs than in wild-type. Ectopic overexpression results in the development of ectopic root hair cells. These data suggest that expression of individual RSL class I proteins is sufficient for root hair development in the cereal O. sativa (rice). Therefore RSL class I genes have been conserved since O. sativa and A. thaliana last shared a common ancestor. However, given that RSL class I genes are not sufficient for root hair development in A. thaliana, it suggests that there are differences in the mechanisms repressing RSL class I gene activity between members of the Poaceae and Brassicaceae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据