4.6 Article

Dehydration of AlPO4-34 studied by variable-temperature NMR, XRD and first-principles calculations

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 4178-4186

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5nj02838h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0021, J1-5447]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microporous zeolite-like aluminophosphate AlPO4-34 is a very promising material for water-adsorption-based thermal energy storage. To obtain better understanding of the dehydration of this material, a detailed variable-temperature nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and first-principles calculation study was carried out. Unlike the previous studies, this one detected three distinct phase transitions during dehydration. The fully hydrated phase of AlPO4-34 first loses one water molecule per unit cell and transforms into the partly dehydrated phase I (space group P1). The molecule that was expelled first is the molecule that was initially located within the double six-membered ring and was very weakly coordinated to the aluminium atom and not involved in hydrogen bonds. During the second phase transition a water molecule is expelled from each chabazite cage. The obtained partly dehydrated phase II (space group P (1) over bar) contains six water molecules in each chabazite cage and four water molecules coordinated to octahedral aluminium. The third transition leads to the completely dehydrated material. Structures of both partly dehydrated phases of AlPO4-34 were determined by the Rietveld method. Variable-temperature NMR and XRD detected very different phase-transition temperatures. This was due to very different sample packing, which significantly influenced the rate of water removal. The confirmation that the two techniques observed the same phases of AlPO4-34 was obtained by the first-principles calculations of NMR observables. Using the XRD-based structural models, the calculations predicted P-31 and Al-27 isotropic chemical shifts that agreed well with the observed ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据