Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment for adolescents (15–18 years): validation using confirmatory factor and composite analyses
出版年份 2023 全文链接
标题
Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment for adolescents (15–18 years): validation using confirmatory factor and composite analyses
作者
关键词
-
出版物
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Frontiers Media SA
发表日期
2023-06-27
DOI
10.3389/fspor.2023.1192025
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment Questionnaire (PPLA-Q) for Adolescents: Validity and Reliability of the Psychological and Social Modules using Mokken Scale Analysis
- (2023) João Mota et al. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS
- Design and psychometrics evaluation of Adolescent Physical Literacy Questionnaire (APLQ)
- (2021) Mostafa Mohammadzadeh et al. Sport Sciences for Health
- Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment Questionnaire (PPLA-Q) for adolescents (15–18 years) from grades 10–12: development, content validation and pilot testing
- (2021) João Mota et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- The Development of Chinese Assessment and Evaluation of Physical Literacy (CAEPL): A Study Using Delphi Method
- (2020) Si-Tong Chen et al. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Estimating and assessing second-order constructs using PLS-PM: the case of composites of composites
- (2020) Florian Schuberth et al. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS
- Physical Literacy in Children and Youth—A Construct Validation Study
- (2019) John Cairney et al. JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION
- How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research
- (2019) Jose Benitez et al. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT
- Perceived physical literacy instrument for adolescents: A further validation of PPLI
- (2018) Raymond K.W. Sum et al. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness
- A Construct Validation Study of PLAYfun
- (2018) JOHN CAIRNEY et al. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
- Refining the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy based on theory and factor analyses
- (2018) Katie E. Gunnell et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- Estimating hierarchical constructs using consistent partial least squares
- (2017) Allard C.R. van Riel et al. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS
- Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research
- (2017) Cenfetelli et al. MIS QUARTERLY
- A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data
- (2016) Klaas Sijtsma et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- The Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy: methods for children in grades 4 to 6 (8 to 12 years)
- (2015) Patricia E. Longmuir et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling
- (2015) Yves Rosseel Journal of Statistical Software
- Physical Activity and Physical Self-Concept in Youth: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2014) Mark J. Babic et al. SPORTS MEDICINE
- Principled missing data methods for researchers
- (2013) Yiran Dong et al. SpringerPlus
- Multidimensionality and Structural Coefficient Bias in Structural Equation Modeling
- (2012) Steven P. Reise et al. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
- Convergent validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): meta-analysis
- (2012) Youngdeok Kim et al. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
- Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review
- (2011) Paul H Lee et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Predicting Factors of Physical Activity in Adolescents: A Systematic Review
- (2009) Hyoungsook Park et al. Asian Nursing Research
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started