4.5 Article

PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE FOR HUMAN GLOBUS PALLIDUS PARS INTERNA NEURONS SIGNALING REWARD AND SENSORY STIMULI

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 328, 期 -, 页码 30-39

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.04.020

关键词

globus pallidus pars interna; reward; sensory; electrophysiology; basal ganglia; human neuroscience

资金

  1. Unilever/Lipton Graduate Fellowship in Neuroscience
  2. University of Toronto Fellowship
  3. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) [98006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) is a component of the basal ganglia, a network of subcortical nuclei that process motor, associative, and limbic information. While non-human primate studies have suggested a role for the GPi in non-motor functions, there have been no single-unit studies of non-motor electrophysiological behavior of human GPi neurons. We therefore sought to extend these findings by collecting single-unit recordings from awake patients during functional stereotactic neurosurgery targeting the GPi for deep brain stimulation. To assess cellular responses to non-motor information, patients performed a reward task where virtual money could be won, lost, or neither, depending on their performance while cellular activity was monitored. Changes in the firing rates of isolated GPi neurons after the presentation of reward-related stimuli were compared between different reward contingencies (win, loss, null). We observed neurons that modulated their firing rate significantly to the presentation of reward-related stimuli. We furthermore found neurons that responded to visual-stimuli more broadly. This is the first single-unit evidence of human GPi neurons carrying non-motor information. These results are broadly consistent with previous findings in the animal literature and suggest non-motor information may be represented in the single-unit activity of human GPi neurons. (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IBRO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据