4.3 Article

Improvement of memory recall by quercetin in rodent contextual fear conditioning and human early-stage Alzheimer's disease patients

期刊

NEUROREPORT
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 671-676

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000594

关键词

activating transcription factor 4; growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible gene 34; Mini Mental State Examination; retrograde amnesia; Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF)
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  4. research project on the development of agricultural products and foods with health-promoting benefits (NARO), Japan
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26460861, 26500006] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) experience a wide array of cognitive deficits, which typically include the impairment of explicit memory. In previous studies, the authors reported that a flavonoid, quercetin, reduces the expression of ATF4 and delays memory deterioration in an early-stage AD mouse model. In the present study, the effects of long-term quercetin intake on memory recall were assessed using contextual fear conditioning in aged wildtype mice. In addition, the present study examined whether memory recall was affected by the intake of quercetin-rich onion (a new cultivar of hybrid onion 'Quergold') powder in early-stage AD patients. In-vivo analysis indicated that memory recall was enhanced in aged mice fed a quercetin-containing diet. Memory recall in early-stage AD patients, determined using the Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale, was significantly improved by the intake of quercetin-rich onion (Quergold) powder for 4 weeks compared with the intake of control onion ('Mashiro' white onion) powder. These results indicate that quercetin might influence memory recall. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据