4.1 Article

On the importance of nano-oxide control in laser powder bed fusion manufactured Ni-based alloys to enhance fracture properties

期刊

MATERIALIA
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2023.101958

关键词

Laser powder bed fusion; Nano-oxide; Nickel alloy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the formation of nano-oxides in Ni-Cr-Mo alloys during laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) was found to have a critical impact on the fracture properties of the materials. Control of oxide formation is crucial for achieving optimal fracture performance.
In this study, a series of Ni-Cr-Mo based alloys (IN625, C22 and NA282), sourced from various powder suppliers and having varying oxygen concentrations (200 ppm to 800 ppm), were printed under similar conditions using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Nano-oxides in the range of 20-50 nm were observed in each alloy in the asprinted state, albeit with different number densities. Room temperature tensile tests and liquid nitrogen (LN2, -196 degrees C) Charpy impact tests were performed to assess the mechanical response of each alloy. The IN625 and C22 samples showed considerably lower impact energy values than the NA282, as well as lower room temperature post-necking tensile elongations, despite showing similar yield strengths and strain hardening behaviours. Fracture surface dimple sizes were shown to correlate with nano-oxide particle spacings. Nano-oxides were found in the middle of most dimples on fracture surfaces suggesting that the nano-oxides are the sites of void nucleation during fracture, despite being only 20-50 nm in size. The precursor metal powders were identified as the primary origin of the nano-oxide particles. This study highlights the critical, detrimental role that nano-oxides, typically present in LPBF metals, have on the fracture properties of these materials. In the case of the Ni-Cr-Mo alloys examined here, limiting oxide formation is critical to achieving optimal fracture properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据