4.7 Article

Understanding how virtuous lenders encourage support for peer-to-peer platforms' prosocial initiatives

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114251

关键词

Peer-to-peer platforms; Prosocial behavior; Donation efficacy; Charitable giving; Virtuous lenders

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies have shown that on peer-to-peer rental service platforms, exposing users to virtuous lenders can increase the effectiveness of platform appeals for prosocial causes. This is because users perceive virtuous lenders as a representation of the platform's ethical commitment, which in turn enhances users' willingness to engage in charitable giving. However, the beneficial effect of virtuous lenders disappears when users exhibit high moral disengagement, suggesting that platforms should strengthen users' moral principles.
Peer-to-peer (P2P) rental service platforms-i.e., platforms where owners of private possessions (e.g., houses) lend them to other people-often deliver appeals that encourage platform users to contribute to prosocial causes (e.g., through charitable donations). Although many users are skeptical about such appeals, this research argues that exposing users to virtuous lenders-i.e., lenders who convey ethicality and unselfishness through their profile descriptions-elicits positive reactions to the above-mentioned appeals. Three experimental studies demonstrate that this occurs because users' perception of a lender's virtuousness extends to the platform and facilitates a belief that it is genuinely committed to prosocial causes. This perception, in turn, enhances users' willingness to engage in charitable giving. However, the beneficial effect of virtuous lenders vanishes when users exhibit high moral disengagement. P2P platforms are, therefore, advised to rely on virtuous lenders and strengthen users' moral principles to increase the persuasiveness of their prosocial appeals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据