4.7 Article

Outsourced Privacy-Preserving Data Alignment on Vertically Partitioned Database

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIG DATA
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 1408-1419

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBDATA.2023.3284271

关键词

Private set intersection; secure outsourcing data computation; secure two-party computation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the context of real-world secure outsourced computations, private data alignment, mainly circuit-based, suffers from high communication overhead and often needs to transfer gigabytes of data. In this paper, a lightweight private data alignment protocol (SC-PSI) is proposed to overcome the bottleneck of communication. SC-PSI utilizes the function secret sharing technique to develop the PSM protocol, which avoids multiple rounds of communication and complex secure comparison circuits.
In the context of real-world secure outsourced computations, private data alignment has been always the essential preprocessing step. However, current private data alignment schemes, mainly circuit-based, suffer from high communication overhead and often need to transfer potentially gigabytes of data. In this paper, we propose a lightweight private data alignment protocol (called SC-PSI) that can overcome the bottleneck of communication. Specifically, SC-PSI involves four phases of computations, including data preprocessing, data outsourcing, private set member (PSM) evaluation and circuit computation (CC). Like prior works, the major overhead of SC-PSI mainly lies in the latter two phases. The improvement is SC-PSI utilizes the function secret sharing technique to develop the PSM protocol, which avoids the multiple rounds of communication to compute intersection set members. Moreover, benefited from our specially designed PSM protocol, SC-PSI does not to execute complex secure comparison circuits in the CC phase. Experimentally, we validate that compared to prior works, SC-PSI can save around 61.39% running time and 89.61% communication overhead.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据