4.7 Article

Removal kinetics of organic carbon from palm oil mill effluent by native duckweeds and its potential as a biofertilizer

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103852

关键词

Recovery; Phytoremediation; Nutrients; Industrial wastewater; Biosorption; Azolla pinnata

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the potential of A. pinnata as a phytoremediator of organic carbon and nutrients from POME. The results showed that A. pinnata could efficiently take up and accumulate organic carbon and nutrients, and the kinetic data followed a pseudo-second-order model. The findings suggest that POME can be used as a cultivation medium for A. pinnata to recover biomass as a biofertilizer for sustainable development goals.
In the present study, the potential of Azolla pinnata as a phytoremediator of organic carbon and nutrients from palm oil mill effluent (POME) was examined. Seventy-two plastic containers each containing 2 L of POME with four Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) concentrations (35, 70, 110, and 200 mg/L) and 5 g of A. pinnata with four plastic containers as a control contaminant for each COD concentration were examined. The results have shown that A. pinnata could take up and accumulate organic carbon (COD) and the nutrients (phosphate (PO43-), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N)) with a high removal efficiency. The kinetic data of COD were found to follow a pseudo-second-order kinetic model, especially at concentrations within 70 to 200 mg/L (R2 > 98.75 %). A pseudo-first-order kinetic model best fits the initial COD concentration of 35 mg/L (R2 = 95.98 %). The Langmuir-type isotherm best described the COD uptake capacity (qe) (12.5, 9.5, 7.3 and 4.6 mg COD/g adsorbent) by plant sorption for initial COD concentrations of 200, 110, 70, and 35 mg/L, respectively. The findings from this study indicated that POME can be utilized by A. pinnata as a cultivation medium leading to the recovery of biomass as a biofertilizer for better sustainability development goals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据