4.8 Article

MIDA boronates are hydrolysed fast and slow by two different mechanisms

期刊

NATURE CHEMISTRY
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 1067-1075

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.2571

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC under European Union's Seventh Framework Programme /ERC grant [340163]
  2. US National Institutes of Health
  3. CONACYT
  4. University of Edinburgh
  5. US National Institutes of Health [GM118185]
  6. Stone family
  7. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [CHE-1352663]
  8. US NSF [CHE-1059084]
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1361104] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Chemistry [1361104] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MIDA boronates (N-methylimidodiacetic boronic acid esters) serve as an increasingly general platform for small-molecule construction based on building blocks, largely because of the dramatic and general rate differences with which they are hydrolysed under various basic conditions. Yet the mechanistic underpinnings of these rate differences have remained unclear, which has hindered efforts to address the current limitations of this chemistry. Here we show that there are two distinct mechanisms for this hydrolysis: one is base mediated and the other neutral. The former can proceed more than three orders of magnitude faster than the latter, and involves a rate-limiting attack by a hydroxide at a MIDA carbonyl carbon. The alternative 'neutral' hydrolysis does not require an exogenous acid or base and involves rate-limiting B-N bond cleavage by a small water cluster, (H2O)(n). The two mechanisms can operate in parallel, and their relative rates are readily quantified by O-18 incorporation. Whether hydrolysis is 'fast' or 'slow' is dictated by the pH, the water activity and the mass-transfer rates between phases. These findings stand to enable, in a rational way, an even more effective and widespread utilization of MIDA boronates in synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据