标题
A multicenter study benchmarks software tools for label-free proteome quantification
作者
关键词
-
出版物
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 11, Pages 1130-1136
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2016-10-05
DOI
10.1038/nbt.3685
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- TRIC: an automated alignment strategy for reproducible protein quantification in targeted proteomics
- (2016) Hannes L Röst et al. NATURE METHODS
- Testing and Validation of Computational Methods for Mass Spectrometry
- (2015) Laurent Gatto et al. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
- Extending the Limits of Quantitative Proteome Profiling with Data-Independent Acquisition and Application to Acetaminophen-Treated Three-Dimensional Liver Microtissues
- (2015) Roland Bruderer et al. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
- The difficulty of a fair comparison
- (2015) NATURE METHODS
- DIA-Umpire: comprehensive computational framework for data-independent acquisition proteomics
- (2015) Chih-Chiang Tsou et al. NATURE METHODS
- Building high-quality assay libraries for targeted analysis of SWATH MS data
- (2015) Olga T Schubert et al. Nature Protocols
- In-depth evaluation of software tools for data-independent acquisition based label-free quantification
- (2015) Jörg Kuharev et al. PROTEOMICS
- Using data-independent, high-resolution mass spectrometry in protein biomarker research: Perspectives and clinical applications
- (2015) Tatjana Sajic et al. Proteomics Clinical Applications
- iPortal: the swiss grid proteomics portal: Requirements and new features based on experience and usability considerations
- (2014) Peter Kunszt et al. CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE
- Biomedical applications of ion mobility-enhanced data-independent acquisition-based label-free quantitative proteomics
- (2014) Ute Distler et al. Expert Review of Proteomics
- General Statistical Framework for Quantitative Proteomics by Stable Isotope Labeling
- (2014) Pedro Navarro et al. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
- Evaluation of Proteomic Search Engines for the Analysis of Histone Modifications
- (2014) Zuo-Fei Yuan et al. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
- Accurate Proteome-wide Label-free Quantification by Delayed Normalization and Maximal Peptide Ratio Extraction, Termed MaxLFQ
- (2014) Jürgen Cox et al. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
- OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data
- (2014) Hannes L Röst et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- MS-GF+ makes progress towards a universal database search tool for proteomics
- (2014) Sangtae Kim et al. Nature Communications
- A repository of assays to quantify 10,000 human proteins by SWATH-MS
- (2014) George Rosenberger et al. Scientific Data
- On best practices in the development of bioinformatics software
- (2014) Felipe da Veiga Leprevost et al. Frontiers in Genetics
- Clustering and Filtering Tandem Mass Spectra Acquired in Data-Independent Mode
- (2013) Huisong Pak et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY
- Combining Results of Multiple Search Engines in Proteomics
- (2013) David Shteynberg et al. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
- Drift time-specific collision energies enable deep-coverage data-independent acquisition proteomics
- (2013) Ute Distler et al. NATURE METHODS
- Using ion purity scores for enhancing quantitative accuracy and precision in complex proteomics samples
- (2012) Scott J. Geromanos et al. ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
- Comparative Analysis of Different Label-Free Mass Spectrometry Based Protein Abundance Estimates and Their Correlation with RNA-Seq Gene Expression Data
- (2012) Kang Ning et al. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
- File Formats Commonly Used in Mass Spectrometry Proteomics
- (2012) Eric W. Deutsch MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
- Targeted Data Extraction of the MS/MS Spectra Generated by Data-independent Acquisition: A New Concept for Consistent and Accurate Proteome Analysis
- (2012) Ludovic C. Gillet et al. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
- Digestion and depletion of abundant proteins improves proteomic coverage
- (2012) Bryan R Fonslow et al. NATURE METHODS
- Toward objective evaluation of proteomic algorithms
- (2012) John R Yates et al. NATURE METHODS
- The Proteomics Identifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013
- (2012) Juan Antonio Vizcaíno et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Comet: An open-source MS/MS sequence database search tool
- (2012) Jimmy K. Eng et al. PROTEOMICS
- Using iRT, a normalized retention time for more targeted measurement of peptides
- (2012) Claudia Escher et al. PROTEOMICS
- More than 100,000 Detectable Peptide Species Elute in Single Shotgun Proteomics Runs but the Majority is Inaccessible to Data-Dependent LC−MS/MS
- (2011) Annette Michalski et al. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
- iProphet: Multi-level Integrative Analysis of Shotgun Proteomic Data Improves Peptide and Protein Identification Rates and Error Estimates
- (2011) David Shteynberg et al. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
- mProphet: automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments
- (2011) Lukas Reiter et al. NATURE METHODS
- Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments
- (2010) Brendan MacLean et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- Proteomics on an Orbitrap Benchtop Mass Spectrometer Using All-ion Fragmentation
- (2010) Tamar Geiger et al. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
- Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective
- (2010) Parag Mallick et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Protein Identification False Discovery Rates for Very Large Proteomics Data Sets Generated by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
- (2009) Lukas Reiter et al. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
- A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry–based proteomics
- (2009) Alexander W Bell et al. NATURE METHODS
- Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis
- (2009) Jacek R Wiśniewski et al. NATURE METHODS
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started