4.7 Article

The machinability and anisotropy of bio-CoCrMo manufactured by directed energy deposition in ultrasonic vibration assisted drilling

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.251

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Ultrasonic drilling; Anisotropy; Cutting simulation; Chip breakage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As additive manufacturing is widely used in the field of implants, the quality of hole-forming using conventional machining has become a limitation. This study investigates the machining response of material anisotropy during ultrasonic drilling and explores the advantages of ultrasonic drilling for additively manufactured parts. The research demonstrates that ultrasonic drilling can improve the quality of hole machining for additively manufactured parts.
Holes are an essential component in achieving the desired function of implants. As the prevalent application of additive manufacturing in the field of implants, the hole-forming quality of additively manufactured parts using conventional machining has become a limitation. In this study, the material anisotropy is first characterized and the machining response of the materials anisotropy during ultrasonic drilling is investigated. To reveal the machining advantages of ultrasonic drilling for additively manufactured parts, a hybrid cutting simulation is employed to simulate the behavior how the ultrasonic vibration removes impurity particles. A chip breakage evaluation model that takes the ultrasonic frequency variation into account is also developed to explain the improvement mechanism on hole surface uniformity. The subsequent drilling experiments demonstrate that ultra-sonic drilling can improve the quality of hole machining for additively manufactured parts. The research has potential to advance the development of additively manufactured implants.& COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据