4.8 Article

How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation

期刊

NATURE
卷 533, 期 7604, 页码 535-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature18005

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-9806649, DEB-1145965]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [PA00P3_134191, PZ00P3_154767]
  3. National University of Singapore
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P3_154767, PA00P3_134191] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Post-copulatory sexual selection (PSS), fuelled by female promiscuity, is credited with the rapid evolution of sperm quality traits across diverse taxa(1). Yet, our understanding of the adaptive significance of sperm ornaments and the cryptic female preferences driving their evolution is extremely limited(1,2). Here we review the evolutionary allometry of exaggerated sexual traits (for example, antlers, horns, tail feathers, mandibles and dewlaps), show that the giant sperm of some Drosophila species are possibly the most extreme ornaments(3,4) in all of nature and demonstrate how their existence challenges theories explaining the intensity of sexual selection, mating-system evolution and the fundamental nature of sex differences(5-9). We also combine quantitative genetic analyses of interacting sex-specific traits in D. melanogaster with comparative analyses of the condition dependence of male and female reproductive potential across species with varying ornament size to reveal complex dynamics that may underlie sperm-length evolution. Our results suggest that producing few gigantic sperm evolved by (1) Fisherian runaway selection mediated by genetic correlations between sperm length, the female preference for long sperm and female mating frequency, and (2) longer sperm increasing the indirect benefits to females. Our results also suggest that the developmental integration of sperm quality and quantity renders post-copulatory sexual selection on ejaculates unlikely to treat male-male competition and female choice as discrete processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据