4.5 Article

Single-crystal quality data from polycrystalline samples: finding the needle in the haystack

期刊

IUCRJ
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 720-728

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S2052252523008163

关键词

multi-grain crystallography; co-crystals; heteroaromatic; in situ diffraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laboratory multi-grain crystallography is important for rapid crystal growth and quick analysis and solving of crystal structures. It can solve crystal structures with relatively small amount of data and is applicable to samples that are liquid at room temperature.
Multi-grain crystallography, traditionally performed at synchrotron sources in association with high-pressure studies, has new relevance with respect to laboratory single-crystal X-ray diffraction, in which crystals can be grown rapidly in situ, and a preliminary dataset analysed and solved in a matter of minutes. Subsequently, a full-sphere of IUCr-quality data can then be collected in a few hours. To demonstrate the applicability of laboratory multi-grain crystallography with Cu K alpha X-rays, co-crystals of hexafluorobenzene and pyrrole were grown rapidly by cooling a 1:1 liquid mixture in an X-ray capillary on the diffractometer. The software is able to identify a single unit cell from as few as 10% of the diffraction spots from a small number of diffraction frames. Once a unit cell is identified, a full crystal structure solution is rapidly obtained by collecting a small amount of data to a resolution of ca 1 angstrom. The co-crystal obtained from the 1:1 mixture showed that hexafluorobenzene and pyrrole crystallize in a 3:4 ratio, in contrast to the columnar 1:1 adduct structures typified by hexafluorobenzene and benzene. The generality of our multi-grain approach for samples that are liquid at room temperature (and form a polycrystalline solid mass on cooling) is further demonstrated by investigating and solving the 1:1 co-crystal formed between hexafluorobenzene and pyridine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据