4.3 Article

Modeling the Behavior of Granular Soils with Different Shape Characteristics Behind a Retaining Wall with Discrete Element and PIV Method

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40996-023-01255-y

关键词

Retaining wall; Granular soil; DEM; PIV; Roundness; Retaining wall; Granular soil; DEM; PIV; Roundness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the particle flow and stress distribution of limestone granular soils with varying roundness classes and sizes. The impact of roundness and relative densities on the distribution of shear stress behind the retaining wall was analyzed. Noninvasive particle image velocimetry and discrete element method were employed to compare experimental and simulation results, which showed good agreement. The study highlights the benefits of using DEM for analyzing retaining walls compared to experimental methods.
This paper reports on a study conducted to investigate the particle flow and stress distribution of limestone granular soils with varying roundness classes, ranging from angular to well-rounded, and sizes ranging from 2.00 to 8.00 mm. The study focused on four groups of soils with three different relative densities of 30, 50, and 70%, situated behind a rigid retaining wall under active and passive earth pressure conditions. The study employed the noninvasive particle image velocimetry (PIV) method and used the discrete element method (DEM) too to compare particle flow estimated by the PIV method. The main objective was to analyze the impact of roundness and relative densities on the distribution of shear stress behind the retaining wall. Additionally, the paper highlights the benefits of using DEM for analyzing retaining walls, compared to experimental methods. The experimental PIV results were qualitatively compared with the simulation results, and the earth pressure simulations showed excellent agreement with the experimental results. Moreover, the resulting internal friction angles were found to be in good agreement with the experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据