4.8 Article

Tuning the structure and habit of iron oxide mesocrystals

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 8, 期 34, 页码 15571-15580

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6nr03776c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. FP-7 Nanomag project [FP7-NMP-604448]
  3. European Community [PIEF-GA-2011-298918]
  4. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  5. German Research Foundation (DFG) [DI 1788/2-1]
  6. Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  7. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [3DEM-NATUR]
  8. SU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A precise control over the meso-and microstructure of ordered and aligned nanoparticle assemblies, i.e., mesocrystals, is essential in the quest for exploiting the collective material properties for potential applications. In this work, we produced evaporation-induced self-assembled mesocrystals with different mesostructures and crystal habits based on iron oxide nanocubes by varying the nanocube size and shape and by applying magnetic fields. A full 3D characterization of the mesocrystals was performed using image analysis, high-resolution scanning electron microscopy and Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering (GISAXS). This enabled the structural determination of e.g. multi-domain mesocrystals with complex crystal habits and the quantification of interparticle distances with sub-nm precision. Mesocrystals of small nanocubes (l = 8.6-12.6 nm) are isostructural with a body centred tetragonal (bct) lattice whereas assemblies of the largest nanocubes in this study (l = 13.6 nm) additionally form a simple cubic (sc) lattice. The mesocrystal habit can be tuned from a square, hexagonal to star-like and pillar shapes depending on the particle size and shape and the strength of the applied magnetic field. Finally, we outline a qualitative phase diagram of the evaporation-induced self-assembled superparamagnetic iron oxide nanocube mesocrystals based on nanocube edge length and magnetic field strength.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据