4.8 Article

Real-time electrical detection of epidermal skin MoS2 biosensor for point-of-care diagnostics

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 767-775

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-016-1289-1

关键词

epidermal skin biomarker; MoS2; biosensor; real-time; point-of-care diagnostics

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2014M3A9 D7070732, NRF-2015R1A5A1037548]
  2. Commercializations Promotion Agency for R&D Outcomes (COMPA) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MISP)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [31Z20130012973, 2014M3A9D7070732] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various approaches have been proposed for point-of-care diagnostics, and in particular, optical detection is preferred because it is relatively simple and fast. At the same time, field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensors have attracted great attention because they can provide highly sensitive and label-free detection. In this work, we present highly sensitive, epidermal skin-type point-of-care devices with system-level integration of flexible MoS2 FET biosensors, read-out circuits, and light-emitting diode (LEDs) that enable real-time detection of prostate cancer antigens (PSA). Regardless of the physical forms or mechanical stress conditions, our proposed high-performance MoS2 biosensors can detect a PSA concentration of 1 pg center dot mL(-1) without specific surface treatment for anti-PSA immobilization on the MoS2 surface on which we characterize and confirm physisorption of anti-PSA using Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) and tapping-mode atomic force microscopy (tm-AFM). Furthermore, current modulation induced by the binding process was stably maintained for longer than 2-3 min. The results indicate that flexible MoS2-based FET biosensors have great potential for point-of-care diagnostics for prostate cancer as well as other biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据