4.2 Article

Evaluation of Occupational Therapy and Music Therapy Co-Treatment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01942638.2023.2253894

关键词

Interdisciplinary collaboration; music therapy; occupational therapy; pediatrics; rehabilitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Examined the effect of co-treatment with music therapy and occupational therapy on infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Found that co-treatment with music therapy may create a more stable and regulated environment for infants. Further research on co-treatment with rehabilitative therapies is recommended.
AimsTo examine co-treatment with music therapy and occupational therapy with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).MethodsA quasi-experimental design was used to study the effect of standard care occupational therapy (SCOT) vs co-treatment with music therapy (Co-Tx) on behavioral state and physiologic measures. 46 participants were enrolled in the study. Interventions were implemented in approximately 20-minute sessions. Physiologic measures, heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2), were collected using Sickbay. Behavioral measures were collected using The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Pain Assessment Tool.ResultsMean heartrates during Co-Tx (161.3 & PLUSMN; 15.4 BPM) did not differ significantly compared to SCOT (161.8 & PLUSMN; 15.7 BPM). In unadjusted comparisons, mean SpO2 levels were significantly higher during Co-Tx than SCOT (95.48 & PLUSMN; 3.43% vs. 95.12 & PLUSMN; 3.71%, p = 0.046). There was a significant decrease in pre- to post-test FLACC scores for Co-Tx when compared to SCOT (decrease of 0.97 & PLUSMN; 1.96 vs. 0.61 & PLUSMN; 1.65, p = 0.023). In adjusted comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences in physiological outcomes.ConclusionsCo-treatment with music therapy may create a more stable and regulated environment for NICU infants. Further research is recommended on music therapy co-treatment with rehabilitative therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据