4.6 Article

A new approach for direct leaching of vanadium from LD converter slag

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 131-140

出版社

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.12.010

关键词

LD converter slag; Vanadium; Direct acid leaching; Optimization; Kinetics; Shrinking core model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct acid leaching process was used to recover vanadium from Linz Donawitz (LD) converter slag. The leaching parameters were studied to obtain conditions that vanadium can be leached without using a pyro metallurgical step since the roasting process requires high energy consumption. The independent leaching factors investigated were liquid to solid ratio (US) (10-20 mUg), temperature (40-70 degrees C), acid concentration (1.5-3.0 M), stirring rate (500-700 rpm) and time (60-120 min). Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the process parameters. The most influencing parameter was found to be temperature and the less effective was acid concentration. It was shown that the optimum condition for recovery of ca. 98% can be obtained at US ratio of 17.52, temperature of 70 degrees C, acid concentration of 2.82 M and leaching time of 120 min. The shrinking core model (SCM) was used to describe the kinetics of the slag acid leaching. A constrained multi-linear regression analysis using the least square technique was used to determine the rate controlling mechanism. This technique takes into account all three possible rate controlling mechanisms for leaching processes (i.e., chemical reaction, diffusion through product layer and liquid film mass transfer) simultaneously. Results of kinetic study by this method shown that the rate of the leaching is controlled by chemical reaction at low temperature whereas it is controlled by diffusion through the solid product layer in a long time, i.e., after 60 mm from the start of the leaching process, at high temperature. (C) 2015 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据