4.8 Article

Energetic robustness to large scale structural fluctuations in a photosynthetic supercomplex

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40146-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that photosynthetic supercomplexes exhibit a wide range of conformations but maintain their efficiency due to specific chlorophylls. These protein complexes are essential for converting solar energy with high efficiency. Despite variability in protein organization, the energy transfer efficiency remains consistent. This finding contributes to a better understanding of the mechanism of photosynthesis.
Robust photosynthetic light harvesting occurs in large membrane supercomplexes. Here, the authors show that supercomplexes occupy an unexpectedly large range of conformations yet maintain their efficiency due to specific, critical chlorophylls. Photosynthetic organisms transport and convert solar energy with near-unity quantum efficiency using large protein supercomplexes held in flexible membranes. The individual proteins position chlorophylls to tight tolerances considered critical for fast and efficient energy transfer. The variability in protein organization within the supercomplexes, and how efficiency is maintained despite variability, had been unresolved. Here, we report on structural heterogeneity in the 2-MDa cyanobacterial PSI-IsiA photosynthetic supercomplex observed using Cryo-EM, revealing large-scale variances in the positions of IsiA relative to PSI. Single-molecule measurements found efficient IsiA-to-PSI energy transfer across all conformations, along with signatures of transiently decoupled IsiA. Structure based calculations showed that rapid IsiA-to-PSI energy transfer is always maintained, and even increases by three-fold in rare conformations via IsiA-specific chls. We postulate that antennae design mitigates structural fluctuations, providing a mechanism for robust energy transfer in the flexible membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据