4.5 Review

Advances in Treatment of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

期刊

CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01459-5

关键词

Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia; MYD88 mutation; Chemoimmunotherapy; BTK inhibitor

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitors are the two most commonly used treatments in first-line treatment of WM, but they have very different characteristics in terms of duration of therapy, route of administration, cost, and adverse effects. The choice of therapy in WM should take into account tumor genotype and patient comorbidities, as well as these parameters. Ongoing and future clinical trials evaluating fixed-duration combinations with BTK inhibitors and novel agents are expected to provide more insights into the treatment of WM.
Purpose of ReviewThe discovery of recurring somatic mutations, in particular MYD88 and CXCR4 mutations, in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, led in the last decade to the development of several therapeutic agents with high efficacy. This review aims to provide an overview of available treatments in WM and novel agents, focusing on studies published over recent years.Recent FindingsThere is no international consensus on the best first-line option in treatment-naive patients. Randomized clinical trials are rare in WM and there has been no prospective comparison of chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitors in the frontline setting.SummaryChemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitors, the two feasible and most widely used treatments in first-line treatment, represent very different options in terms of duration of therapy, route of administration, cost, and adverse effect. In addition to tumor genotype and patient comorbidities, choice of therapy in WM should take into account these parameters. Results of ongoing and future clinical trials evaluating fixed-duration combinations with BTK inhibitors and novel agents are awaited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据