4.0 Article

Effectiveness of a native vein arteriovenous fistula tracking system

期刊

SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sdi.13179

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a tracking program on the functional maturation rate of arteriovenous fistula and found that the program can improve the maturation rate.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a tracking program on the functional maturation rate of arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Methods: Two major clinical outcomes (commencement of cannulation and functional maturation) of created AVFs were compared between two cohorts. (i) Cohort 1: historical cohort; (ii) Cohort 2: AVFs created after implementation of the tracking project. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the association between cohort allocation and the two major clinical outcomes. Results: Data of 114 and 141 patients were analyzed respectively from Cohorts 1 (historical data) and 2 (with AVF tracking). After adjustment of covariates in the multivariable analysis, the AVFs created in Cohort 2 were more likely to be cannulated earlier (adjusted HR: 2.82; 95% CI: 1.97-4.05; p < 0.001), compared to those in Cohort 1. Similarly, the AVFs of Cohort 2 patients had significantly higher probability of functional maturation (adjusted HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.31-2.48; p < 0.001) than fistulas in Cohort 1. Cannulation was commenced for half of the AVFs by 4.1 months post-creation in the historical cohort (Cohort 1), whereas in the post-tracking cohort, 50% of the AVFs were cannulated by 2.3 months after creation ( p < 0.001). It took 5.5 and 4.3 months for 50% of the AVFs created in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 patients to achieve catheter-free functional maturation, respectively (p = 0.06). Conclusion: An AVF tracking program with maturation target for the access surgeons, together with a standardized tracking, feedback, and clinical strategy adjustment system is able to improve the AVF functional maturation rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据