4.0 Review

Risk prediction models for cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review

期刊

SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sdi.13181

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review evaluated risk prediction models for cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients and found that the included models demonstrated good overall predictive performance, assisting healthcare professionals in identifying high-risk individuals. However, there were some risks of bias, and improvements in modeling methods or external validation are needed for better guidance in clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review of risk prediction models for cardiovascular (CV) events in hemodialysis (HD) patients, and provide a reference for the application and optimization of related prediction models.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from inception to 1 February 2023. Two authors independently conducted the literature search, selection, and screening. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was applied to evaluate the risk of bias and applicability of the included literature.ResultsA total of nine studies containing 12 models were included, with performance measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) lying between 0.70 and 0.88. Age, diabetes mellitus (DM), C-reactive protein (CRP), and albumin (ALB) were the most commonly identified predictors of CV events in HD patients. While the included models demonstrated good applicability, there were still certain risks of bias, primarily related to inadequate handling of missing data and transformation of continuous variables, as well as a lack of model performance validation.ConclusionThe included models showed good overall predictive performance and can assist healthcare professionals in the early identification of high-risk individuals for CV events in HD patients. In the future, the modeling methods should be improved, or the existing models should undergo external validation to provide better guidance for clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据