4.3 Review

Green synthesis of strontium oxide nanoparticles and strontium based nanocomposites prepared by plant extract: a critical review

期刊

REVIEWS IN INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/revic-2023-0011

关键词

nanotechnology; strontium; green synthesis; nanoparticles; photocatalysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review study discusses the biogenic approaches for the synthesis of strontium oxide nanoparticles (SrO NPs) and their potential applications. Green synthesized SrO NPs exhibit excellent biocompatibility and show promising antibacterial, antioxidant, and antifungal properties, making them an emerging trend for sustainable and eco-friendly synthesis.
Recently, strontium oxide nanoparticles (SrO NPs) have become the center of attention due to potential features and promising applications. The physicochemical approaches possess many limitations including extreme experimental conditions, highly complex instruments and use of hazardous chemicals. An eco-friendly and sustainable approach from biogenic sources for formation of SrO NPs is an emerging trend nowadays to effectively replace conventional approaches. This review study all those aspects that facilitate the reader for understanding all biogenic approaches of SrO NPs for their use in different applications with less toxicity issues. In this study, firstly we discuss in detail about plant and other biogenic assemblies based on the synthesis of SrO NPs after which parameters affecting the synthesis of SrO NPs are discussed and finally excellent biomedical applications of SrO NPs along with mechanism are summarized. The literature also showed that green synthesized SrO NPs are highly biocompatible in nature and showed excellent anti-bacterial, anti-oxidant and anti-fungal potential. Hence, this study will provide an understanding to researchers about recent trends for the formation of SrO NPs through different biogenic assemblies and their potential biomedical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据