4.7 Article

Interaction between biomass ash and iron ore oxygen carrier during chemical looping combustion

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 277, 期 -, 页码 70-78

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.105

关键词

Biomass ash; Iron ore; Oxygen carrier; Chemical looping combustion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406035, 51276037, 51476029]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551489]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3203005601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical looping combustion (CLC) presents a new method to increase the utilization efficiency of biomass. Due to the existence of ash in biomass, the interaction between biomass ash and oxygen carrier is a significant concern during the biomass CLC process. Three typical biomass ashes were added into an iron ore oxygen carrier, and their effects on the performance of oxygen carrier were carried out during the CLC process. The effects of some key variables on the performance of oxygen carrier were evaluated, including biomass ash type, ash addition ratio (0-20%) and cycle number. The results indicate that fuel conversion was significantly influenced by the addition of biomass ash. The addition of SiO2-rich wheat straw ash (WSA) was likely to be converted into potassium silicates, and it caused serious particle sintering of oxygen carrier. It led to a reactivity decrease of oxygen carrier and its reduction extent was slighter. In contrast, fuel conversion was always promoted by the addition of corn stalk ash (CSA) and rape stalk ash (RSA), i.e., K2O-rich ashes with a relatively lower SiO2 content. A slight reactivity decrease was also observed at a high CSA ratio (20%). Cycle experiments indicate that the iron ore activated by CSA and RSA has a relatively stable reactivity promotion. Finally, possible mechanisms for the enhanced performance of iron ore by biomass ash were explored. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据