4.3 Article

Preclinical evaluation of bozepinib in bladder cancer cell lines: modulation of the NPP1 enzyme

期刊

PURINERGIC SIGNALLING
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11302-023-09975-6

关键词

Bladder cancer; Bozepinib; Purinergic system; NPP1 enzyme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the activity of BZP in the purinergic system of bladder cancer cell lines and compared it with cisplatin. The results showed that BZP exhibited superior antitumor activity against bladder cancer cell lines in vitro.
Bladder cancer (BC) is the most common cancer of the urinary tract. Bozepinib (BZP), a purine-derived molecule, is a potential compound for the treatment of cancer. Purinergic signaling consists of the activity of nucleosides and nucleotides present in the extracellular environment, modulating a variety of biological actions. In cancer, this signaling is mainly controlled by the enzymatic cascade involving the NTPDase/E-NPP family and ecto-5'-nucleotidase/CD73, which hydrolyze extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to adenosine (ADO). The aim of this work is to evaluate the activity of BZP in the purinergic system in BC cell lines and to compare its in vitro antitumor activity with cisplatin, a chemotherapeutic drug widely used in the treatment of BC. In this study, two different BC cell lines, grade 1 RT4 and the more aggressive grade 3 T24, were used along with a human fibroblast cell line MRC-5, a cell used to predict the selectivity index (SI). BZP shows strong antitumor activity, with notable IC50 values (8.7 +/- 0.9 mu M for RT4; 6.7 +/- 0.7 mu M for T24), far from the SI for cisplatin (SI for BZP: 19.7 and 25.7 for RT4 and T24, respectively; SI for cisplatin: 1.7 for T24). BZP arrests T24 cells in the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle, inducing early apoptosis. Moreover, BZP increases ATP and ADP hydrolysis and gene/protein expression of the NPP1 enzyme in the T24 cell line. In conclusion, BZP shows superior activity compared to cisplatin against BC cell lines in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据