4.7 Article

Strand and Cell Type-specific Function of microRNA-126 in Angiogenesis

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 1823-1835

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2016.108

关键词

-

资金

  1. Tulane University
  2. NIH [EY021862]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness foundation
  4. BrightFocus Foundation Award in Age-related Macular Degeneration
  5. American Heart Association Southeast Affiliate Postdoctoral fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

microRNAs or miRs have been shown to be pivotal modulators of vascular development. The strand and cell type-specific function of miR-126 in angiogenesis, especially pathological angiogenesis, remains poorly defined. We characterized the retinal vascular phenotype of miR126(-/-) mice, and tested the function of miR-126 strands (miR-126-3p and -5p) using in vitro angiogenesis models and a mouse model of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. We found that miR-126 is critical for retinal vascular development but has dual function in pathological angiogenesis. miR-126(-/-)mice showed defective postnatal retinal vascular development and remodeling, which is partially rescued by genetic knockout of its target gene Spred-1. Surprisingly, either silencing miR-126-3p by LNA-antimiR or overexpressing miR-126-3p by miRNA mimic repressed laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. To dissect the underlying mechanism, we found in endothelial cells, silencing of miR-126-3p repressed angiogenesis, while overexpression of miR-126-5p enhanced angiogenesis. However, in retinal pigment epithelial cells, miR-126-3p repressed vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) expression via a novel mechanism of regulating alpha B-Crystallin promoter activity and by directly targeting VEGF-A 3'-untranslated region. These findings provide first genetic evidence that miR-126 is required for the development of different retinal vascular layers, and also uncover a strand and cell type-specific function of miR-126 in ocular pathological angiogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据