4.8 Article

The Development of DNA-Compatible S-Glycosyl Transformations

期刊

ORGANIC LETTERS
卷 25, 期 26, 页码 4940-4944

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c01799

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we discovered two different S-glycosyl transformations in a DNA-encoded library (DEL)-compatible environment. One approach involves 2-chloro-1,3-dimethylimidazolidinium chloride (DMC)-mediated S-glycosylation, but it has limited substrate scope for DEL construction. We also investigated a photoinduced DNA-compatible S-glycosyl transformation using allyl sugar sulfones, which showed excellent compatibility with functional groups and yielded desired DNA-linked glycosyl derivatives. This pioneering DNA-compatible S-glycosyl transformation is a valuable tool for preparing glycosyl DELs and exploring sugar-incorporated delivery systems.
In this study, we revealed two distinct S-glycosyl transformationsin a DNA-encoded library (DEL)-compatible environment. The first approachinvolves 2-chloro-1,3-dimethylimidazolidinium chloride (DMC)-mediatedS-glycosylation, which is facilitated by the coupling of unprotectedsugar units with the thiol residue of the DNA-linked compounds. However,this methodology falls short of the requirement for DEL constructiondue to its limited substrate scope. We further investigated a photoinducedDNA-compatible S-glycosyl transformation through a radical process.In this alternative approach, allyl sugar sulfones serve as sugardonors and are conjugated to DNA-linked compounds upon irradiationwith green light. Encouragingly, this on-DNA glycosyl chemistry demonstratedexcellent compatibility with functional groups presented in both sugarunits and peptides, affording the desired DNA-linked glycosyl derivativeswith good to excellent conversions. This pioneering DNA-compatibleS-glycosyl transformation represents a valuable tool, facilitatingthe preparation of glycosyl DELs and offering avenues for the explorationof sugar-incorporated delivery systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据