4.5 Article

Expansive Phenotypic Landscape of Botrytis cinerea Shows Differential Contribution of Genetic Diversity and Plasticity

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 287-298

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-09-15-0196-R

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS 1339125]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture [CA-D-PLS-7033-H]
  3. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF99]
  4. Jastro Shields and Graduate Student Researcher Awards from the University of California-Davis, Plant Science Department

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modern evolutionary synthesis suggests that both environmental variation and genetic diversity are critical determinants of pathogen success. However, the relative contribution of these two sources of variation is not routinely measured. To estimate the relative contribution of plasticity and genetic diversity for virulence-associated phenotypes in a generalist plant pathogen, we grew a population of 15 isolates of Botrytis cinerea from throughout the world, under a variety of in vitro and in planta conditions. Under in planta conditions, phenotypic differences between the isolates were determined by the combination of genotypic variation within the pathogen and environmental variation. In contrast, phenotypic differences between the isolates under in vitro conditions were predominantly determined by genetic variation in the pathogen. Using a correlation network approach, we link the phenotypic variation under in vitro experimental conditions to phenotypic variation during plant infection. This study indicates that there is a high level of phenotypic variation within B. cinerea that is controlled by a mixture of genetic variation, environment, and genotype x environment. This argues that future experiments into the pathogenicity of B. cinerea must account for the genetic and environmental variation within the pathogen to better sample the potential phenotypic space of the pathogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据