4.0 Article

An overview of the distribution and ecology of the alien cyanobacteria species Raphidiopsis raciborskii, Sphaerospermopsis aphanizomenoides and Chrysosporum bergii in Europe

期刊

OCEANOLOGICAL AND HYDROBIOLOGICAL STUDIES
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 312-332

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.26881/oahs-2023.3.06

关键词

non-native species; freshwaters; cyanotoxins; invasion; temperate zone; environmental variables

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyanobacteria blooms pose a threat to freshwater ecosystems, with climate change expected to increase their invasions. Non-native species entering European waters cause a decline in biodiversity, extinctions, and environmental and human health issues due to cyanotoxin production. This article provides an overview of the distribution and occurrence of several non-native cyanobacteria species in Europe, discussing the environmental factors influencing their establishment and adaptability.
Cyanobacteria can form blooms and pose a threat to the functioning of freshwater ecosystems. Cyanobacterial invasions are expected to increase due to climate change. Alien species cause a decline in biodiversity by displacing native species, lead to extinctions, affect food webs, and produce cyanotoxins which potentially impact the environment and human health. Three species, Raphidiopsis raciborskii, Sphaerospermospis aphanizomenoides and Chrysosporum bergii, are considered non-native to European waters. Recently, they have expanded their native habitats and become established in temperate lakes. In this article, we provide a detailed overview of the countries where they are distributed and the occurrence of the blooms in Europe. We discuss the biotic and abiotic environmental factors that influence their establishment, as well as the characteristics of the species that make them so adaptable in non-native habitats. Understanding the interplay of these factors will allow us to better recognise patterns of invasiveness and predict their future threats to ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据