4.4 Article

Gauge effects in local hybrid functionals evaluated for weak interactions and the GMTKN30 test set

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYSICS
卷 114, 期 7-8, 页码 1118-1127

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2016.1139209

关键词

Local hybrid functional; local mixing function; exchange-energy density; calibration function; DFT-D3 corrections; GMTKN30 test set; S22 test set; weak interactions

资金

  1. DFG [KA1187/13-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The so-called gauge problem', due to the non-uniqueness of exchange-energy densities, is a fundamental challenge for density functionals depending on these energy densities, such as local hybrid functionals. We have recently demonstrated how gauge effects influence the potential-energy curves of the argon dimer, and other quantities depending on non-physical' Pauli repulsions introduced by incompatible gauges of (semi-)local and exact-exchange energy densities . Introduction of suitable calibration functions depending only on semi-local quantities allowed to correct for these deficiencies and suggested ways to obtain more accurate local hybrid functionals beyond the local spin density approximation (LSDA) exchange-energy density. Here we extend the study of the gauge problem by comparing a number of uncalibrated and calibrated local hybrids for (1) the potential-energy curves of further noble-gas dimers and (2) for the entire GMTKN30 test set and its individual subsets. We find that DFT-D3 dispersion corrections fitted to be compatible with uncalibrated local hybrids have to correct not only for missing London dispersion but also for gauge artefacts that make weak interactions too repulsive. This burden is taken away when using properly calibrated local hybrids, which perform much better for dispersion-sensitive quantities already without D3 corrections, and which require only the physically relevant dispersion to be corrected for. The present results suggest directions for further improvement of calibration functions for local hybrids. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据