4.4 Article

Association between screen time and depressive symptoms in a sample of Chinese medical students: Mediator role of empathy

期刊

NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nhs.13059

关键词

depressive symptoms; empathy; medical education; medical students; mental health; screen time

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the association between screen time and depressive symptoms among medical students, with a focus on the mediating role of cognitive empathy. The results suggested that cognitive empathy played a positive mediating role between screen time and depressive symptoms, highlighting the importance of controlling screen time and enhancing cognitive empathy as interventions for medical students' depressive symptoms.
Medical students are at high risk of psychological subhealth under heavy stress with increasing screen time. This study aimed to explore the association between screen time and depressive symptoms and determine empathy as a mediating factor. In this cross-sectional study, a total of 945 medical students were surveyed, and 924 medical students were ultimately included after standard exclusion criteria. They reported their daily screen time and completed the Chinese version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version (JSE-S) and the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). t tests and analysis of variance showed a significant difference in empathy and depressive symptoms by sex, stage, and screen time. The correlation analysis revealed that both affective and cognitive empathy have inverse associations with depressive symptoms. The mediation model confirmed that cognitive empathy played a positive mediating role between screen time and depressive symptoms, reducing the impact of screen time on depressive symptoms. Our study may add empirical evidence to prevent and intervene in depressive symptoms. These findings call for considering controlling screen time and enhancing cognitive empathy as interventions for medical students' depressive symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据