Expression of GRP78 and its copartners in HEK293 and pancreatic cancer cell lines (BxPC-3/PANC-1) exposed to MRI and CT contrast agents

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-associated chaperones trigger a defense mechanism called as unfolded protein response (UPR) which can manage apoptosis and be determinative in cell fate. Both anticancer drug effects and potential toxicity effects of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) contrast agents were aimed to be evaluated. For this purpose, we investigated expression profiles of endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated chaperone molecules in human pancreatic tumor lines BxPC-3 and PANC-1 and control human embryonic kidney cells 293 (HEK293) induced with a variety of gadolinium and iohexol contrast agents. Protein expression levels of ER stress-associated chaperones (master regulator: GRP78/Bip and its copartners: Calnexin, Ero1, PDI, CHOP, IRE1 alpha and PERK) were evaluated with Western blotting. Expression levels at mRNA level were also assessed for GRP78/Bip and CHOP with real-time PCR. Induction of cells was carried out with four different Gd-based contrast agents (GBCAs): (Dotarem, Optimark, Primovist and Gadovist) and two different iohexol agents (Omnipol, Omnipaque). CT contrast agents tested in the study did not result in significant ER stress in HEK293 cells. However, they do not seem to have theranostic potential in pancreas cancer through ER pathway. The potential efficiency of macrocyclic MRI contrast agents to provoke apoptosis via ER stress-associated chaperones in BxPC-3 cells lends credibility for their future theranostic use in pancreas cancer as long as undesired toxicity effects were carefully considered. ER stress markers and/or contrast agents seem to have promising potential to be translated into the clinical practice to manage pancreas cancer progression.

Automated summary

This study investigated the expression profiles of endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated chaperone molecules in human pancreatic tumor lines and control cells induced with different contrast agents. The results suggest that some magnetic resonance and computed tomography contrast agents may have therapeutic and diagnostic potential for pancreatic cancer. However, their potential toxicity effects should be carefully considered.