4.2 Article

Spatial Models of Piezo Proteins and Protein-Protein Interaction Networks in Trichoplax Animals (Placozoa)

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 905-912

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S0026893323050072

关键词

piezo proteins; mechanotransduction; protein-protein interactions; Placozoa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The marine organism Trichoplax provides a simple model for understanding the interactions between cells during development and movement. Two orthologs of the mouse Piezo1 protein were found in Trichoplax, suggesting a role in mechanosensation. Spatial models and protein-protein interactions were analyzed, highlighting the potential signal transduction from mechanoreceptors to the cell nucleus.
The marine free-living organism Trichoplax (phylum Placozoa) resembles a unicellular amoeba in shape and type of movement. Trichoplax diverged from the main evolutionary tree in the Neoproterozoic Era. Trichoplax provides one of the simplest models of multicellular animals and a strong example of how cells of an organism interact to form an ensemble during its development and movement. Two orthologs of the mouse Piezo1 protein (6B3R) were found in two Trichoplax haplotypes, H1 and H2, as a result of a search for similar sequences in the NCBI databases. Spatial models of the respective proteins XP_002112008.1 and RDD46920.1 were created via a structural alignment with 6KG7 (mouse Piezo2) template. Their domain structures were analyzed, and a limited graph of protein-protein interactions was constructed for the hypothetical mechanosensor XP_002112008.1. The possibility of signal transduction from the mechanoreceptor to membrane complexes, the cytoplasm, and the cell nucleus was shown. Trichoplax mechanoreceptors were assumed to play a role in perception of force stimuli from neighbor cells and the environment. Based on the results, the primitive Trichoplax organism was proposed as the simplest multicellular model of mechanical and morphogenetic movements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据