4.3 Article

Ferroelectric liquid crystal array driven by a two-layer electrode with a 1 x 1 μm pixel pitch for light modulation in electro-holography

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsid.1260

关键词

electro-holography; ferroelectric liquid crystal; holographic display; spatial light modulator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrated the high-resolution display capability and successful reconstruction of a 3D holographic static image using FLC with a two-layer electrode, showing that FLC is a strong candidate material for holographic displays with wide-viewing-zone angles.
We clarified that a ferroelectric liquid crystal (FLC) has high resolution display capability as small as 1 x 1 mu m pixel pitch using an FLC pixel array with a two-layer electrode, which has a 1 x 1-mu m-checkered apertured electrode and a plane electrode separated by an insulation layer. By applying +2 V to the apertured electrode and -10 V to the plane electrode in the two-layer electrode and 0 V to the transparent common electrode, a checkered pattern was clearly observed, which indicates the successful individual pixel driving with a pixel pitch of 1 x 1 mu m. When fabricating 1 x 2-mu m-pitch rectangular FLC pixels, we elucidated that the liquid crystal alignment direction should be along the shorter side of the pixels to avoid asymmetric transmittance distribution in each pixel. Moreover, we successfully reconstructed a 3D holographic image using 10 x 10 k FLC pixel array with a pitch of 1 x 1 mu m driven by the two-layer electrode with hologram-patterned apertures. We showed that FLC is a strong candidate material for realizing spatial light modulator with extremely small pixel pitches, which is essential for holographic displays with wide-viewing-zone angles. We clarified that a ferroelectric liquid crystal (FLC) has high resolution display capability as small as 1 x 1 mu m pixel pitch using a two-layer electrode and demonstrated a three-dimensional holographic static image with the FLC and two-layer electrode.image

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据