4.8 Article

Type-I CdS/ZnS Core/Shell Quantum Dot-Gold Heterostructural Nanocrystals for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 145, 期 40, 页码 21886-21896

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c06065

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The decoration of Au satellite-type domains on the surface of CdS/ZnS quantum dots effectively overcomes the energy barrier and improves the photocatalytic reaction rate by over 400 fold. Transient absorption spectroscopy studies showed that charges can be efficiently extracted and transferred to surrounding molecular substrates in a subpicosecond time scale in such hybrid nanocrystals.
Developing Type-I core/shell quantum dots is of great importance toward fabricating stable and sustainable photocatalysts. However, the application of Type-I systems has been limited due to the strongly confined photogenerated charges by the energy barrier originating from the wide-bandgap shell material. In this project, we found that through the decoration of Au satellite-type domains on the surface of Type-I CdS/ZnS core/shell quantum dots, such an energy barrier can be effectively overcome and an over 400-fold enhancement of photocatalytic H(2 )evolution rate was achieved compared to bare CdS/ZnS quantum dots. Transient absorption spectroscopic studies indicated that the charges can be effectively extracted and subsequently transferred to surrounding molecular substrates in a subpicosecond time scale in such hybrid nanocrystals. Based on density functional theory calculations, the ultrafast charge separation rates were ascribed to the formation of intermediate Au2S layer at the semiconductor-metal interface, which can successfully offset the energy confinement introduced by the ZnS shell. Our findings not only provide insightful understandings on charge carrier dynamics in semiconductor-metal heterostructural materials but also pave the way for the future design of quantum dot-based hybrid photocatalytic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据