Charting a New Path: Regulating College Athlete Name, Image and Likeness After NCAA v. Alston Through Collective Bargaining

This study examines the remaining options for sport managers to balance the interests of college athletes and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) in regulating college athlete name, image, and likeness (NIL). The paper is divided into six substantive sections. The first section, Background: The NCAA's Defense of NIL Restrictions, provides a brief history of the NCAA's legal defense to challenges against its NIL regulations. The second section, U.S. Congress Is Unlikely to Regulate College Athletes' NIL Rights, addresses proposed federal legislation and Congress' willingness to regulate the use of NIL by college athletes. The third section, The Impact of O'Bannon and Alston on NCAA's NIL Restraints, examines controlling case law, specifically O'Bannon v. NCAA and NCAA v. Alston, and how current antitrust law precedent shapes the scope by which the NCAA can regulate college athletes' NIL. The fourth section, State Laws Regulating the NIL Marketplace, addresses state legislation regulating college athlete NIL use. The fifth section, The Applicability of Labor Law to Regulating College Athletes' NIL, discusses the current college athlete NIL marketplace and analyzes whether labor law presents an optimal way forward for the NCAA to regulate NIL post-Alston. The sixth section, College Athletes' Employee Status as a Pathway to Redefine the NCAA's Amateurism, concludes by examining the law's role in regulating NIL and discussing stakeholder implications.

Automated summary

This study examines the remaining options for sport managers to balance the interests of college athletes and the NCAA in regulating college athlete name, image, and likeness (NIL). It is divided into six sections, covering the NCAA's defense of NIL restrictions, the unlikelihood of Congress regulating college athletes' NIL rights, the impact of relevant case law on NCAA's NIL restraints, state laws regulating the NIL marketplace, the applicability of labor law, and the possibility of redefining NCAA's amateurism through college athletes' employee status.