4.4 Article

Fully Coupled Analysis of Aerothermoelastic Deformation of a Scramjet Inlet

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/1.B39345

关键词

Supersonic Combustion Ramjet Engines; Elastic Deformation; Thermal Structural Analysis; Aerodynamic Performance; Thermal Control and Protection; Aircraft Components and Structure; Aerodynamic Coefficients; Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics; Aerothermoelasticity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The challenges faced by supersonic combustion ramjets-scramjets in hypersonic flight include the engine's ability to withstand harsh thermal and mechanical loads and the impact of inlet deformation on overall performance and efficiency.
Although supersonic combustion ramjets-scramjets-provide a fuel-efficient method for propulsion at hypersonic speeds, current challenges with the engine prohibit the robustness necessary for space accessibility and trans-atmospheric flight. One such challenge the engine faces is the vehicle and inlet's compliance under harsh thermal and mechanical loads at hypersonic speeds. The deformation of the inlet has ramifications on the downstream components and the engine as a whole, creating conditions outside of the original design envelope. Additionally, the deformations impact the vehicle's aerodynamic performance due to the integrated airframe/inlet design. One mitigation technique that works in tandem with thermal management is active cooling. It is important to understand the impacts of active cooling on the inlet and engine performance; in order to do so, a multiphysics modeling approach is used to capture the coupled aerothermostructural response of the inlet, and a multifidelity approach is used to model the remaining components of the scramjet. The system is found to be extremely sensitive to the changes in deformation, leading to increased flow separation and heating and to deviations of the engine performance and efficiency from the original design point.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据