4.5 Article

Integrative proteomics and transcriptomics revealed that activation of the IL-6R/JAK2/STAT3/MMP9 signaling pathway is correlated with invasion of pituitary null cell adenomas

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 436, 期 C, 页码 195-203

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.07.025

关键词

Pituitary adenomas; Null cell adenomas; Invasion; IL-6R; JAK2; STAT3

资金

  1. Research Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry of Health [201402008]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2014AA020610]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271627]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are a highly heterogeneous group, but few studies have explored the invasion mechanism of specific subtypes of NFPAs. The objective of this study was to investigate the differential molecular expression patterns and the critical biological signaling pathways involved in the invasion of pituitary null cell adenomas (PNCAs) through integrative proteomics and transcriptomics. A total of 1160 genes and 283 proteins were found to be differentially expressed in invasive and non-invasive PNCAs. The differentially expressed molecules related to invasion were enriched in 15 canonical signaling pathways, 15 clusters of diseases or biological functions and 5 upstream molecules. Among them, the majority of the differentially expressed molecules were found to be involved in transport of molecule, migration of cells and cell movement. Notably, IL-6 was a significantly activated upstream regulator, and the IL6R/JAK2/STAT3 cascade was found to play a critical role in acute phase response signaling, which was the most significant canonical signaling pathway. Furthermore, we validated the overexpression of IL-6R, JAK2, STAT3, p-STAT3 and MMP9 in invasive PNCAs. Our data suggest that overactivation of the IL-6R/JAK2/STAT3/MMP9 pathway is critical for the invasion of PNCAs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据